How government legal professionals can confidently embrace AI innovation without compromising data security.
Highlights
- Secure legal AI requires tools that never train on customer data, ensuring government case information stays fully protected.
- Absolute data containment prevents leaks by enforcing strict retention, ownership, and encryption standards for sensitive government information.
- Government legal teams gain both security and operational confidence by choosing AI built for federal compliance and professional-grade protection.
As AI becomes embedded in workflows, the stakes couldn’t be higher for government legal professionals to take extra measures. One misstep with sensitive government data can compromise national security, violate federal regulations, and undermine public trust.
According to recent studies, 42% of surveyed professionals cite security concerns as a barrier to AI investment, while another 13% identify data security implications as the most significant negative consequence of using AI. For government lawyers handling classified information, citizen data, and sensitive legal matters, these concerns are career-defining risks.
Jump to ↓
The two non-negotiables of secure legal AI
Beyond compliance: Strategic advantages of secure AI
The standard for government legal AI
Moving forward with confidence
The consumer AI trap
Recent high-profile cases have demonstrated the dangers of using consumer-grade AI tools for professional legal work. Beyond the well-documented incidents of fabricated case law that led to sanctions and fines, there’s a more insidious risk: data exposure. When government attorneys use consumer AI tools with unclear data policies, sensitive case information can become accessible to unauthorized parties, creating compliance violations and security risks.
The accessibility of consumer-grade AI makes these tools appealing, but the white paper “Security as Strategy” makes an important distinction when it states that “generic AI tools may be accessible, but they aren’t built for legal precision“. Government legal professionals must decide whether to lead with secure, professional-grade tools or accept the risk of compromising excellence with generic platforms.
The two non-negotiables of secure legal AI
When evaluating AI solutions for government legal work, two security principles stand as absolute non-negotiables:
1. Zero customer data training: Your information stays yours
The first non-negotiable is ensuring that your sensitive government data is never used to train AI models. Many consumer AI platforms retain user inputs for training and development purposes, creating a scenario where your confidential legal strategies, case details, and government communications could inadvertently become part of the AI’s knowledge base.
Professional-grade legal AI solutions take a fundamentally different approach. CoCounsel Legal, for example, is not trained on any customer data, but by content generated and scrutinized by a team of hundreds of bar-admitted attorneys and data scientists. This means your sensitive government information remains exactly where it belongs—under your control and protected by your agency’s security protocols.
This distinction is critical for government lawyers who handle everything from national security matters to citizen privacy data. When you input information into a secure legal AI system, you maintain complete ownership and control over that data, ensuring compliance with federal information handling requirements.
2. Absolute data containment: No leaks, no exceptions
The second non-negotiable is ensuring that your data never leaks beyond your intended use. Consumer AI tools often have vague data retention policies and unclear ownership terms that can put government agencies at risk.
The white paper illustrates a risk of data ownership example: “A midsize law firm uses a free AI writing assistant to draft internal strategy memos and client communications. The tool’s terms of service are vague about data ownership and retention. Without realizing it, the firm has loaded proprietary litigation strategies and client details into a system that claims broad rights to use, store, and even reproduce user inputs”.
For government legal professionals, this scenario represents a potential national security risk. Professional-grade AI solutions address this through comprehensive data protection measures:
- End-to-end encryption at all times during transmission and storage
- Clear data ownership policies that ensure government agencies retain full control
- Transparent retention policies with defined data lifecycle management
- Audit trails that demonstrate compliance with federal standards
Beyond compliance: Strategic advantages of secure AI
Choosing secure legal AI isn’t just about avoiding risks—it’s about gaining strategic advantages that elevate government legal operations:
The standard for government legal AI
Government legal work demands professional-grade AI that meets federal security standards.
CoCounsel Legal represents this professional standard. Used by U.S. federal courts and built on trusted Westlaw and Practical Law content, it meets rigorous federal security requirements while delivering the AI capabilities government legal professionals need. With certifications including ISO/IEC 42001:2023, SOC 2 Type 2, and FedRAMP In Process status, it provides the security framework that government operations demand.
Moving forward with confidence
The future of government legal work will be powered by AI—but only AI that meets the highest security standards. By focusing on these two non-negotiables, such as zero customer data training and absolute data containment, government legal professionals can confidently embrace AI innovation while maintaining the trust and security that public service demands.
A solution that meets federal security standards while delivering professional capabilities is CoCounsel Legal.
