Ethical uses of generative AI in the practice of law

In the rapidly evolving landscape of legal technology, the integration of generative AI tools presents both unprecedented opportunities and significant ethical challenges. Ryan Groff, a distinguished member of the Massachusetts Bar and a lecturer at New England Law, explores these dimensions in his enlightening webinar, “Ethical Uses of Generative AI in the Practice of Law.” 

In the webinar, Ryan Groff discusses the ethical implications of using generative AI (GenAI) in legal practices, tracing the history of GenAI applications in law and distinguishing between various AI tools available today.  He provides an insightful overview of the historical application of GenAI in legal contexts and differentiates the various AI tools currently available. Groff emphasizes that while AI can enhance the efficiency of legal practices, it should not undermine the critical judgment of lawyers. He underscores the importance of maintaining rigorous supervision, safeguarding client confidentiality, and ensuring technological proficiency. 

Key takeaways ↓

Basic assumptions about legal ethics and AI

Groff set the stage by asserting, 

No matter what tools they use, it is important for lawyers to maintain independent judgment and commit to ethical practices in law. 

Ethical uses of generative AI

Highlighting the ethical deployment of AI, Groff stressed the importance of user control and accountability. He notes “Responsible development of AI is crucial for its ethical application in law,” advocating for a thorough understanding of AI’s capabilities and limitations to ensure its appropriate use. 

Brief history of AI in law

Groff then provided a brief history of AI in the legal sector, focusing on the evolution of large language models that have been tailored to meet the specific needs of legal professionals. Groff also described the various types of AI tools available today, giving an overview of both general-use AI tools and those specifically designed for legal tasks to illustrate the broad spectrum of technologies available to legal professionals today. 

AI news and insights Insights, updates, and all things AI   See what’s new ↗

Application of legal ethics to AI

Groff reiterated that ethical rules apply to AI without exceptions. He emphasized core ABA rules that require “Lawyers must maintain tech competence and ensure ongoing learning.” He also noted the necessity for lawyers to maintain technological competence and engage in ongoing learning to effectively supervise AI legal assistants and ensure confidentiality and effective communication. 

Case studies and examples

Grof provided several notable case studies, such as Avianca v. Marta, which serve as practical examples of both the potential and the pitfalls of AI in legal practice. 

Specific legal AI tools

Groff made a clear differentiation between general AI tools and those specifically engineered for legal applications, highlighting the importance of selecting the right tools for specific legal tasks. 

Potential and limitations of AI in law

Groff advised, pointing out the critical need for domain-specific engineering in AI tools to ensure they are fit for legal purposes. 

Conclusion

The webinar concluded with a dynamic Q&A session, where Groff addressed various inquiries from the audience, providing deeper insights into the practical aspects of using AI in legal practice. 

Groff then wrapped up the session by recapping the key points discussed, reminding legal professionals of the importance of continuous learning and adaptation to integrate AI ethically and effectively into their practices. He closed with a reminder that technology must enhance rather than replace the human element in law. 

Sign up for the free monthly Thomson Reuters AI newsletter to get insights on how AI is transforming the legal industry and notifications for future webinars.