The pros and cons of paid vs. free AI solutions that appeal to solo practitioners and small law firms
Highlights
- Legal AI is now essential for firms of all sizes, with free options including open-source models, freemium/trial versions, and public LLMs like ChatGPT, each offering different levels of accessibility and functionality.
- Using free public AI models demands extreme caution due to significant risks.
- Despite their utility as a starting point, the limitations of free tools often lead to the need for professional-grade legal AI.
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is having an undeniable impact on the legal landscape, improving efficiency, accuracy, and speed. Yet many smaller firms might believe that AI is too expensive to justify.
No matter the size of the firm, powerful legal AI has become fundamental to staying relevant and competitive, even for solo attorneys, small practices, and pro bono professionals.
While larger organizations frequently use AI, legal teams of any size can and should streamline their work with the power of large language models (LLMs). They just need to know where to start.
In this guide, we’ll explore the differences between genuinely free, freemium, and open source AI. We’ll review alternatives you can use to enhance your practice and how to determine when to consider paid options.
Jump to ↓
Defining “free” in the world of legal AI
Practical strategies for legal professionals
Key considerations for free vs. paid legal AI
CoCounsel Legal
AI, trusted content, and expert insights from Westlaw and Practical Law resources
Go professional-grade AI ↗Defining “free” in the world of legal AI
When it comes to legal AI, “free” is complex. Different types of free legal models include:
Open-source legal AI
Open-source legal AI refers to free AI that anyone can use, modify, or share, without paying licensing fees. These models feature community-driven customizations through transparent, editable code.
One example of an open-source AI library is Hugging Face. It has pre-trained models — called Transformers — along with tools for building, training, and deploying them. People have fine-tuned its AI models to perform specific legal tasks.
However, open-source legal AI has drawbacks:
- Maturity and maintenance: Many open-source solutions are research prototypes or are less actively maintained than commercial software. Even in their libraries, you might find AI models last updated several years ago and no longer maintained.
- Deployment and integration: You might need technical expertise to deploy, customize, and integrate these tools into a professional legal workflow.
- Data security and privacy: It’s crucial to know how open-source models, especially those with community contributions, were trained and what data they might retain. By contrast, if you’re hosting open-source LLMs on your own servers, you retain full control over your data. But you’ll still need a technical expert to set up the free legal AI and maintain it.
- Ethical considerations: Like any AI, the open-source version must be used responsibly, with a clear understanding of any limitations and biases.
Legal AI freemium and trial models
With legal freemium AI models, the basic features are free and the premium legal features are paid. You could quickly find that you need more than the basic services and have to upgrade to a paid tier.
In a similar fashion, many legal AI providers offer free trials so you can test a limited form of their service. Simply search for “free trial” or “free demo” with the name of the AI product you want to try.
Public AI for legal applications
Another option is using the free versions of public LLMs like ChatGPT. Public AI can aid legal professionals in their initial queries, summaries, or brainstorming.
But lawyers should approach them with caution. Public LLMs can pose security risks if they’re not self-hosted. Because they aren’t trained on the same datasets as professional legal AI models, they’re more likely to hallucinate inaccuracies. For example, in 2023 a New York lawyer mistakenly cited made-up cases generated by their AI.
These hallucinations occur because, at their core, LLMs simply use pattern recognition to mimic human logic. They can’t understand intent or analyze facts. If you use a free public LLM, you should proceed with extreme caution.
White paper
The pitfalls of consumer-grade tech and the power of professional AI-powered solutions for law firms
View white paper ↗Practical strategies for legal professionals
If you’re considering incorporating free legal AI into your practice, approach it with a DIY mindset and follow these guidelines.
- Learn how to prompt effectively. When using AI prompts, clarify which jurisdictions you’re working under. Or limit which websites or datasets the AI uses, so it doesn’t source sites like Wikipedia or Reddit.
- Compare different public LLMs. Try using the same prompts on ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini, then compare the answers.
- Check for hallucinations. Make sure your AI isn’t sending you case citations that don’t exist.
- Keep a close eye on the AI’s legal reasoning. A consumer AI trained on public datasets can easily misunderstand legal precedent or jurisdictional nuance.
- Avoid LLMs’ known weaknesses. LLMs are predictive models, so avoid asking them to perform math calculations or other queries that might produce harmful errors.
- Know when it’s time to upgrade. Be mindful of when you need to switch to professional-grade legal AI.
Key considerations for free vs. paid legal AI
While smaller firms and solo practitioners can benefit greatly from introducing AI into their workflows, they should remember these caveats.
- Free doesn’t mean risk-free: Always vet your free legal AI tool. LLMs can pose data privacy, security, and confidentiality risks. A consumer platform might retain user input indefinitely or create permanent records of confidential attorney-client information.
- Free trials come with limitations: Free AI versions can restrict access, limit usage, or yield less accurate results than paid versions. At some point, you might need to invest in a paid tier.
- AI should work for you: AI is meant to be an assistant, not a replacement for a lawyer’s legal judgment, ethical duties, and client interactions.
- Verification is a must: Whether you’re using AI for research, document analysis, or drafting, always verify that you’re not being fed hallucinations or misinterpretations.
While free legal AI tools are a great place to start, you could need to go further.
CoCounsel Legal is a comprehensive, professional-grade AI solution that can augment your research, analysis, and drafting, while drawing exclusively from authoritative legal content.
CoCounsel Legal
AI lawyers swear by: Trusted content, expert insights, and an all-in-one solution with ISO 42001 certification
See it in action ↗
